An insurer had moved quickly on generative AI and had around forty use cases in production, spread across claims, underwriting, customer service and internal operations. Spend on models and supporting infrastructure had grown ninefold in twelve months. Finance received one consolidated invoice from each provider and could not see which use cases or business lines were behind the cost, or whether any of it was paying for itself. After several months of missed forecasts, the CFO put new AI initiatives on hold until the organization could show where the money was going.
Lydatum set up an AI FinOps practice with the insurer's finance and technology teams, built in four parts:
The unit economics review led the insurer to retire six use cases that cost more than they returned and to redesign four others. Finance and engineering review the same figures each month, and an internal team we trained during the engagement now runs the practice.
Within five months the insurer had a cost base it could explain and forecast.
Monthly spend fell by 47% while transaction volumes kept growing, and forecasts came within five percent of actuals, which was enough for the CFO to lift the hold on new initiatives. Each new use case now comes forward with a cost model and a target cost per transaction.
Services Delivered: AI Cost Visibility & Attribution, Model Routing & Cost Optimization, AI Unit Economics & ROI, AI Budget Governance & Forecasting
Technologies Used: Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, LiteLLM, OpenTelemetry, Snowflake, Power BI, Python
Schedule a free consultation to discover how AI and Data can drive your business success