The operations team at a global asset manager reconciled cash and positions every day across more than a dozen custodians and prime brokers. The matching engine left about 4,000 breaks each morning for 30 analysts to clear by hand. Around 60% came from timing differences or reference data mismatches, and each of those still had to be traced to its source and explained. Shorter settlement cycles left less time to do it, older breaks were piling up, and the firm's experienced analysts had little time left for the exceptions that carried real risk.
Lydatum built an agentic workflow on top of the existing matching engine that takes each break from detection to a proposed resolution:
Nothing above the agreed thresholds was posted without an analyst's approval, and each proposal carried the evidence the analyst needed to decide. We built an evaluation suite from two years of historical breaks and rerun it whenever a prompt or model changes, so operations and risk can check accuracy before an update is released.
Six months after launch, agents were handling 82% of daily break volume and the team's attention had moved to complex and high-value exceptions.
Routine breaks are now cleared or queued for one-click approval before the team starts its day. The backlog of aged breaks was gone within the first quarter, and the firm met its shorter settlement deadlines without adding headcount. Sampled reviews have kept agent accuracy above the threshold set by operational risk.
Services Delivered: Agentic Workflow Automation, Multi-Agent Systems & Orchestration, Agent Evaluation & Observability, Data Pipelines & Integration
Technologies Used: LangGraph, Azure OpenAI, Model Context Protocol (MCP), Snowflake, dbt, Apache Kafka, Python
Schedule a free consultation to discover how AI and Data can drive your business success